Community Search
The case for dropping the hydrology requirement
Moderator(s): Ginger W. Jones
Thread Score:
1 |
Thread Actions

5/23/2017 at 1:05:33 PM GMT
Posts: 3
Thanks for taking the time to put this together, Mark.  It was a very good read.

5/24/2017 at 12:40:19 PM GMT
Posts: 24
I agree with Mark, and would like to see the hydrology part dropped from the definition and eliminated from the test. When I took the test in 1995, it was the first time hydrology was included. It tripped me up and I had to take that part again. I have never designed storm or sanitary and do not intend to. I want engineers to stay out of our business and I will gladly stay out of theirs.

6/10/2017 at 5:58:02 PM GMT
Posts: 5
How about a Two-Tier system? Let those who want to do design/hydraulics acquire further training.

I'm in favor of increasing the educational requirements for new registrants. I posted a while back on the 4 year degree thread, so I won't repeat that, but additional educational requirements coupled with a required internship would go a long way toward helping things. This is a very different world than from back when I was a puppy, and education is the key to the future.

Dale Yawn

8/11/2017 at 11:39:02 AM GMT
Posts: 4
Well said. I agree.

10/16/2017 at 2:36:17 AM GMT
Posts: 1
While hydrology is a pointless requirement, I think it would be very unwise to further reduce professional requirements in the state while every other state is heading in the other direction.

12/15/2017 at 12:09:46 AM GMT
Posts: 1
Does anyone know of a board approved online hydrology course in the Georgia university system?

more Calendar

7/19/2018 » 7/21/2018

1/17/2019 » 1/18/2019
2019 Technical Seminar

Contact Us

P.O. Box 778
Douglasville, GA30133-0778



Association Management Software Powered by YourMembership  ::  Legal